President Trump’s Second-Term Cabinet: An Overview

As of April 13, 2025, President Donald Trump’s second-term Cabinet continues to reflect his administration’s emphasis on loyalty, private-sector experience, and a commitment to deregulation. While the core Cabinet appointments remain largely unchanged, recent developments have introduced notable dynamics within the administration.​

Elon Musk’s Role in the Administration

Elon Musk, serving as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), has become a unique figure within the Trump administration. Despite publicly disagreeing with President Trump on certain policies, such as trade tariffs and NASA budget cuts, Musk maintains a favorable relationship with the President. His influence extends to internal Cabinet matters, and he has been involved in disputes with other officials, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Musk’s outspoken positions and endorsements of political candidates, both domestically and internationally, have raised questions about his role in the administration. 

Department of State

• Secretary: Marco Rubio​

  • Background: Former U.S. Senator from Florida and presidential candidate, Rubio has extensive experience in foreign relations, particularly concerning Latin America and national security.​

  • Implications: His appointment signals a potential shift toward a more assertive U.S. foreign policy stance.
    ​

Department of Defense

• Secretary: Pete Hegseth​

  • Background: Former Army National Guard officer and Fox News commentator, Hegseth’s military service includes deployments to Guantanamo Bay, Iraq, and Afghanistan.​

  • Implications: His media presence and advocacy for traditional military values suggest a potential shift in defense policies.
    ​

Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)

• Secretary: Robert F. Kennedy Jr.​

  • Background: Environmental lawyer and vaccine skeptic, Kennedy’s controversial views on vaccines have raised concerns among public health experts about the future direction of vaccination programs and public health initiatives.

  • ​

Department of Homeland Security (DHS)

• Secretary: Kristi Noem​

  • Background: Former Governor of South Dakota, Noem’s tenure as governor was marked by a strong stance on states’ rights and limited federal intervention.​

  • Implications: Her leadership may influence DHS’s approach to national security and immigration enforcement.
    ​

Department of the Treasury

• Secretary: Scott Bessent​

  • Background: Hedge fund manager with extensive experience in financial markets.​

  • Implications: Bessent’s background in investment management may lead to policies favoring market-driven approaches to economic issues.
    ​

Department of Labor

• Secretary: Lori Chavez-DeRemer​

  • Background: Former congresswoman from Oregon and daughter of a Teamsters union member.​

  • Confirmation: Chavez-DeRemer was confirmed by the Senate with a bipartisan vote of 67-32. During her confirmation hearings, she addressed questions about her previous support for the Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act, adjusting her stance to gain broader support.
    ​

Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)

• Secretary: Scott Turner​

  • Background: Former NFL player and motivational speaker, Turner served as the executive director of the White House Opportunity and Revitalization Council, focusing on economic development in distressed communities.
    ​

Department of Education

• Secretary: Linda McMahon​

  • Background: Former Administrator of the Small Business Administration and co-founder of World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE).​

  • Implications: McMahon’s business background may influence a shift toward privatization and business-oriented approaches in education policy.
    ​

Department of Energy

• Secretary: Chris Wright​

  • Background: CEO of Liberty Energy, an oil field services company.​

  • Implications: Wright’s background in the fossil fuel industry suggests a potential shift in energy policy toward traditional energy sources.
    ​

Department of Justice

• Attorney General: Pam Bondi​

  • Background: Former Attorney General of Florida, Bondi’s tenure was marked by a strong stance on conservative legal issues.​

  • Implications: Her leadership may influence the Justice Department’s priorities, potentially focusing on issues aligned with conservative legal perspectives.
    ​

Department of Agriculture

• Secretary: Brooke Rollins​

  • Background: Former president and CEO of the Texas Public Policy Foundation and director of the White House Domestic Policy Council.​

  • Implications: Rollins’ background suggests a focus on conservative agricultural policies and deregulation.
    ​

Department of Commerce

• Secretary: Howard Lutnick​

  • Background: CEO of Cantor Fitzgerald, a global financial services firm.​

  • Implications: Lutnick’s experience in financial services may influence commerce policies favoring financial markets and deregulation.
    ​

Department of the Interior

• Secretary: Doug Burgum​

  • Background: Former Governor of North Dakota and businessman.​

  • Implications: Burgum’s leadership may focus on energy development and land use policies favorable to industry interests.
    ​

Department of Transportation

• Secretary: Sean Duffy​

  • Background: Former U.S. Representative from Wisconsin and television personality.​

  • Implications: Duffy’s appointment may lead to transportation policies that align with conservative priorities and infrastructure development.
    ​

Department of Veterans Affairs

• Secretary: Doug Collins​

  • Background: Former U.S. Representative from Georgia and ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee.​

  • Implications: Collins’ leadership may focus on reforming veterans’ services and addressing issues within the VA system.​

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

• Administrator: Lee Zeldin​

  • Background: Former U.S. Representative from New York.​

  • Implications: Zeldin’s leadership may lead to environmental policies that balance regulatory measures with economic considerations.
    ​

Small Business Administration (SBA)

• Administrator: Kelly Loeffler

  Key Themes Emerging from Trump’s Cabinet Choices

  1. Ideological and Political Alignment

  Many of the appointees have been long-time supporters of Trump or individuals closely associated with his political movement. This includes prominent conservatives like Pam Bondi (Attorney General), Kristi Noem (DHS), and Pete Hegseth (Defense). These appointments are consistent with a broader strategy of consolidating executive power with individuals aligned with the administration’s goals.

  2. Private Sector and Media Backgrounds

  Several cabinet members come from private business (e.g., Scott Bessent at Treasury, Chris Wright at Energy, Howard Lutnick at Commerce) or media (e.g., Hegseth, McMahon). These figures often bring outsider perspectives and aim to disrupt established bureaucratic practices—though sometimes at the cost of traditional institutional experience.

  3. Structural Disruption and Consolidation

  Elon Musk’s role in leading the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) adds an unprecedented element. His mandate to streamline or dismantle government programs, coupled with tension among Cabinet members, introduces significant disruption to longstanding agency functions and internal governance norms.

  4. Confirmation Dynamics and Bipartisanship

  Some nominations—like Lori Chavez-DeRemer (Labor)—have been notable for navigating initial skepticism and earning bipartisan confirmation. Others, such as RFK Jr. (HHS), have generated controversy but still cleared Senate votes, signaling that traditional confirmation pathways remain active despite the political temperature.

  5. Institutional Friction and Legal Scrutiny

  The structure and operation of Trump’s Cabinet, including DOGE’s sweeping powers and executive orders impacting agency independence, have prompted lawsuits, whistleblower actions, and judicial rulings questioning the constitutionality of certain executive moves.

  ---

  
  Internal Challenges and Controversies

  The administration faces internal challenges, including the “Signalgate” scandal involving National Security Adviser Mike Waltz, who mistakenly included a journalist in a private group chat discussing sensitive war plans. This incident has led to bipartisan criticism and calls for accountability. ​news

  Additionally, Vice President JD Vance is reportedly under scrutiny, with rumors suggesting potential replacement due to internal disagreements. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. also faces criticism for administrative issues within his department.​

  
  Conclusion

  President Trump’s second-term Cabinet continues to evolve, with key figures like Elon Musk and Scott Bessent playing significant roles in shaping policy and administration dynamics. While the Cabinet appointments reflect the administration’s priorities, internal controversies and public disagreements among officials highlight the complexities of governance in the current political climate.